Validation List no. 217. Valid publication of new names and new combinations effectively published outside the IJSEM

of

The purpose of this list is to publish in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) those new names and new combinations that were effectively published outside the IJSEM as set forth in Rule 27 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP; 2022 Revision) [1].Authors and other individuals wishing to have new names and/or combinations included in future lists should send an electronic copy of the published paper to the IJSEM Editorial Office for confirmation that all of the other requirements for valid publication have been met.It is also a requirement of IJSEM and the International Committee of Systematics of Prokaryotes that authors of new species, new subspecies and new combinations provide evidence that types are deposited in two recognized culture collections in two different countries.It should be noted that the date of valid publication of these new names and combinations is the date of publication of this list, not the date of the original publication of the names and combinations.The authors of the new names and combinations are as given below.Inclusion of a name on these lists validates the publication of the name and thereby makes it available in the nomenclature of prokaryotes.Inclusion of a name on these lists is part of the requirements of valid publication of an effectively published name.Indeed, some of these names may, in time, be shown to be synonyms, or the organisms may be transferred to another genus, thus necessitating the creation of a new combination.The journal in which the name was effective published does not have continuous pages.
The effective publication states that the type strain was also deposited as CCUG 34286, but no documentation was supplied. 5 The list editors have corrected the epithet to prioriisuperbiae ( pri.o. ri.i. su.per' bi.ae.N.L. fem.n. prioria, a priory; L. fem.n. superbia, pride; N.L. gen.fem.n. prioriisuperbiae, of Priory Pride …). 6 The list editors have corrected the epithet to roseum (ro' se.um.L. neut.adj.roseum, rose-colored, pink). 7 The list editors have corrected the epithet to uluponensis ( u. lu.po.nen'sis.N.L. fem.adj.uluponensis, originating from Ulupō, …). 8 The list editors have corrected the epithet to ureilytica ( u. re.i. ly' ti.ca.N.L. fem.n. urea, urea; N.L. masc.adj.lyticus (from Gr. masc.adj.lytikos), able to loosen, able to dissolve; N.L. fem.adj.ureilytica, urea-dissolving). 9The following syllabification and etymology are preferred: oh.lo.nen'sis.N.L. fem.adj.ohlonensis, belonging to the Ohlone land. 10 The list editors have corrected the epithet to mesophila ( me.so' phi.la.N.L. fem.adj.mesophila, mesophilic). 11 The protologue states DSMZ 115219 instead of DSM 115219. 12 The protologue heading should state Enterobacter instead of E. 13 The effective publication states that the type strain was also deposited as CIP 103550, CCUG 33777, CECT 5075, WDCM 00082 and NCTC 13380, but no documentation was supplied. 14 The protologue states DSMZ 116041 instead of DSM 116041. 15 The protologue heading should state sp.nov.instead of sp.Nov., and following etymology is preferred: … Gr. masc.adj.polys, many; Gr. neut.n. sakcharon, sugar; Gr. masc.n. lytikos, dissolving; N.L. masc.adj.polysaccharolyticus, …).16 The following syllabification and etymology are preferred: sal.fin' ge.ri.N.L. gen.n. salfingeri…, for the pioneering contributions of Dr. Max Salfinger, 17 The epithet looks like Latin but is malformed.Quorum is a derived form of the pronoun qui, in the genitive plural, meaning 'whose', 'of whom', and nocere does not mean 'quench' but 'hurt'.Moreover, the guidelines of Appendix 9 of the ICNP for the formation of compound epithets were not followed.The epithet multitudinisentens was earlier used to mean 'quorum sensing'.18 The list editors have corrected the epithet to speifideaquila ( spe.i. fi.de.a' qui.la.L. fem.n. spes, hope; L. fem.n. fides, faith; L. fem.n. aquila, eagle; N.L. fem.n. speifideaquila, the eagle of hope and faith).The effective publication states that the type strain was also deposited as GDMCC 1.1951, but no documentation was supplied.20 The effective publication states that the type strain was also deposited as GDMCC 1.1949, but no documentation was supplied.

21
The effective publication states that the type strain was also deposited as KCTC 32301, but no documentation was supplied.

22
The list editors have corrected the epithet to sonneratiae ( son.ne.ra' ti.ae.N.L. gen.n. sonneratiae, of Sonneratia …).23 The JCM accession number of the type strain is 34337 and not 34,337 as given in the protologue.24 The following syllabification and etymology are preferred: Se. le.no.ba' cu.lum.Gr. fem.n. selene, the moon; L. neut.n. baculum, a stick, a rod; N.L. neut.n.Selenobaculum, a rod-shaped bacterium belonging to the family Selenomonadaceae.25 The list editors have corrected the epithet to gibii (gi'bi.i.N.L. gen.n. gibii, of GBI, acronym for Green-Bio Institute, where the type strain was isolated).26 The effective publication states that the type strain was also deposited as BGMRC 2019 and NBRC 112057, but no documentation was supplied.27 The KCTC accession number of the type strain is 92089 and not 92,089 as given in the protologue.28 The protologue heading should state Zhongshania ponticola instead of Z. ponticola.
The following correction should be made in Validation List 215 [46]: The type strain of Luteibacter aegosomaticola Joe et al. 2023 was deposited as JCM 35472 and KCTC 92393, and not as JCM 35471 and KCTC 92392.

Name/authors Proposed as Nomenclatural type 1 Priority 2 Reference
Priority number assigned according to the date the documentation and request for validation are received.